Cybercrime Victimisation and Categorization – A View from the Perspective of Routine-Activity-Theory (RAT)

Authors

  • Edith Huber
  • Bettina Pospisil
  • Thilo Sauter
  • Albert Treytl

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18716/ojs/krimoj/2025.1.7

Keywords:

Awareness, Cybercrime, Cybersecurity, Routine Activity Theory, Victimisation

Abstract

This study explores the intersection of cybercrime victimisation and prevention through the lens of Routine Activity Theory (RAT). Using a representative survey in Austria, the research examines the victimisation experiences of private individuals, focussing on financial, data, and personal cybercrimes. The findings reveal significant differences in demographics and guardianship levels among victims of different cybercrime types. Notably, higher levels of physical and personal guardianship were unexpectedly correlated with increased victimisation. This study underscores the heterogeneity of cybercrime and the need for nuanced prevention strategies that take into account the distinct characteristics of various cybercrime types. The implications highlight the complexity of the relationship between cybersecurity measures and victimisation, challenging assumptions about the protective efficacy of increased cybersecurity awareness and measures.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-27

How to Cite

Huber, E., Pospisil, B., Sauter, T., & Treytl, A. (2025). Cybercrime Victimisation and Categorization – A View from the Perspective of Routine-Activity-Theory (RAT). Kriminologie - Das Online-Journal | Criminology - The Online Journal, (7), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.18716/ojs/krimoj/2025.1.7